Talk:Quebec to appeal long-gun registry destruction to the Supreme Court

Active discussions


WN:Headline must be present tense, and describes the focal event which is something that has recently happened. --Pi zero (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I changed will to to. Kudu ~I/O~ 23:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Third paragraphEdit

This paragraph makes mention of "billions of dollars" but doesn't explain how this economic damage could have occurred. Is it lost sales, is it cost of enforcement and maintenance of the registry? Can you expound a little on this? Cheers, --SVTCobra 01:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't think there is much clear documentation on this. There is some, though, on Wikipedia: the consensus seems to be that it's related to government inefficiency. I mentioned the figure because it's often used as a catch-all argument by the conservative camp. Kudu ~I/O~ 03:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1937895 [Passed]Edit

Return to "Quebec to appeal long-gun registry destruction to the Supreme Court" page.