Talk:ONCE defeats Getafe 86-36 in Spain's top level wheelchair basketball league

Journalist notes

Almost all the notes are from the handwritten ones. This is supplemented by the other materials provided.

Notes from Getafe v ONCE game.

--LauraHale (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Player names

I have pictures I managed to take with player names and numbers. This is a list based on reading them as there was no printed roster. The quality of the pictures is such reviewer may need to view and zoom on image. This information can also be found here for getafe and here for ONCE. Some players are referenced as national team members, and additional links are provided inline to support this, because not every foreign player is an international. (The USA one is not.)

For ONCE:

12: Bill Latham, 4 point player

13: Rafael Muño Gamez, 2 point player, born 1975

9: Alejandro Zarzuela Beltran, 3 point player, born 1967

Daniel Rodriguez, 1 point player

14: 4.5 point player

For Getafe:

5: 4 point player

6: Ryan Timothy Martin, 2 point player, born 1979

7: Veronica Perez Gutierez, 4 point player, born 1988

8: Daniel Serapio Martinez, 2 point player, born 1972

4: Maurice N. Amacher, 3 point player

9: Angel, 2.5 point player

12: 1 point player

13: Rafael, 3.5 point player

Picture of player cards to verify above
Image: LauraHale.

Picture of player cards to verify above
Image: LauraHale.

Picture of player cards to verify above
Image: LauraHale.

Picture of player cards to verify above
Image: LauraHale.

• Well... I thought I'd check this data, and some things didn't tally. Alejandro Zarzuela was born in 1987, Perez's first name is Virginia rather than Veronica, and Getafe 13's name isn't Rafael. Though I'm not entirely sure what to do when the web pages actively disagree with the cards, as with Perez's class (4.5 vs 4). --Pi zero (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Score sheet

I got permission to take these. They are very assisting with verification if they are readable. The quality of the pictures is such reviewer may need to view and zoom on image.

Picture of the official score card.
Image: Photographer name.

Picture of the official score card.
Image: Photographer name.

Picture of the official score card.
Image: Photographer name.

Scores

I thought I took more pictures of the scoreboard but alas. This information is supplemented with my notes. The quality of the pictures is such reviewer may need to view and zoom on image.

Picture of the score board.
Image: LauraHale.

Picture of the score board.
Image: LauraHale.

Review of revision 2144090 [Passed]

Revision 2144090 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: When descrepancies arose with the notes, often I coped by pulling the material in question, which generally didn't seem problematic since there were already some gaps. The pictures of the score sheet didn't help because I was unable to decipher them; this may have been helped by the less-than-perfect legibility through the pictures, but I suspect I'd not have understood them even with perfect legibility. This is OR, and only slightly stretching the usual time window for synthesis. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2144090 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: When descrepancies arose with the notes, often I coped by pulling the material in question, which generally didn't seem problematic since there were already some gaps. The pictures of the score sheet didn't help because I was unable to decipher them; this may have been helped by the less-than-perfect legibility through the pictures, but I suspect I'd not have understood them even with perfect legibility. This is OR, and only slightly stretching the usual time window for synthesis. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.