Talk:Nobel Prize in Literature Committee abandons efforts to contact Bob Dylan

Review of revision 4256343 [Not ready]

Revision 4256343 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Needs to be established; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: There needs to be a focal event, something specific enough to say on what day it took place. The lede should answer question "when" (along with other of the five Ws and an H about the focal event), and should show that the focal event is newsworthy — newsworthiness includes freshness, which can't be shown without saying when the event took place. If the Nobel committee made some announcement, perhaps that could be the focal event? Then the lede needs to say that they made such an announcement, and say (amongst other things) when that happened. Btw, it is't safe to assume our international audience all know what "MIA" stands for. Abbreviations should generally be avoided in headlines. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4256343 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Needs to be established; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: There needs to be a focal event, something specific enough to say on what day it took place. The lede should answer question "when" (along with other of the five Ws and an H about the focal event), and should show that the focal event is newsworthy — newsworthiness includes freshness, which can't be shown without saying when the event took place. If the Nobel committee made some announcement, perhaps that could be the focal event? Then the lede needs to say that they made such an announcement, and say (amongst other things) when that happened. Btw, it is't safe to assume our international audience all know what "MIA" stands for. Abbreviations should generally be avoided in headlines. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Resubmission for review of article

Pi zero:

Thank you very much for your detailed comments and instructions. I tried to address the issues you mentioned and resubmitted my article for re-review.

However, please note I was unable to figure out how to revise the working title so the code was inserted into the article itself.

Leftcoastbanana (talk) 22:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

@Leftcoastbanana: Atm your account is less than four days old, so the wiki software doesn't allow you to move/rename articles, which is how you change the headline. Once the wiki software gives you that right, on the control bar at the top of the page, on the right, there's a drop-down menu that should have "move" (or maybe "rename" on it. --Pi zero (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Review of revision 4256628 [Passed]

Revision 4256628 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I like when we can use {{translated quote}}, as in this case (because you provided the Swedish source); it's added value we can give our readers that most English news sources don't provide — they just present the quotes as if everyone had spoken English in the first place, whereas we can give the reader an opportunity to try their hand at the original rather than just taking our word for how to translate it. It's good to have an image, even if it's rather generic; the first article I wrote for Wikinews was a short item that, in retrospect, would have been just perfect if only it had had a picture of a riding mower. detailed history of edits during review The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4256628 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I like when we can use {{translated quote}}, as in this case (because you provided the Swedish source); it's added value we can give our readers that most English news sources don't provide — they just present the quotes as if everyone had spoken English in the first place, whereas we can give the reader an opportunity to try their hand at the original rather than just taking our word for how to translate it. It's good to have an image, even if it's rather generic; the first article I wrote for Wikinews was a short item that, in retrospect, would have been just perfect if only it had had a picture of a riding mower. detailed history of edits during review The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Protect

{{makeprotected}}

Not another... Heavy Water (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Done. [₂₄Cr][talk] 11:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)