Talk:Nico Rosberg takes pole for 2015 Brazilian Grand Prix

Review of revision 3977340 [Not ready]

Revision 3977340 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: We require two mutually independent sources for a synthesis article. We strongly recommend reading them all before beginning to write. The lede should be a short, to-the-point paragraph briefly summarizing the focal event by succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the five Ws and H about it. In the process it should establish newsworthiness of the focus, which makes "when" doubly important since it's both one of the five Ws and also key to freshness (one of the elements of newsworthiness). An explanation of the significance is appropriate, too (as another of the elements of newsworthiness is relevance). Details should be left for later paragraphs (see inverted pyramid). Minimal article length is generally three paragraphs with total text equivalent to about three medium-size paragraphs; I'd guesstimate that would be at least twice the current total text. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 3977340 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: We require two mutually independent sources for a synthesis article. We strongly recommend reading them all before beginning to write. The lede should be a short, to-the-point paragraph briefly summarizing the focal event by succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the five Ws and H about it. In the process it should establish newsworthiness of the focus, which makes "when" doubly important since it's both one of the five Ws and also key to freshness (one of the elements of newsworthiness). An explanation of the significance is appropriate, too (as another of the elements of newsworthiness is relevance). Details should be left for later paragraphs (see inverted pyramid). Minimal article length is generally three paragraphs with total text equivalent to about three medium-size paragraphs; I'd guesstimate that would be at least twice the current total text. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

I don't know enough terms for understanding this. Some quotes from sources:

• Lotus driver Pastor Maldonado was unable to match teammate Grosjean's performance and was knocked out in Q1 by less than a tenth of a second.
• Jenson Button and Fernando Alonso were once again out of Q2, the Briton finishing down in 18th position in the quickest McLaren.
• Nico Rosberg secured his fifth pole position in a row after beating Lewis Hamilton to the top spot in qualifying for the Brazilian Grand Prix.
• Nico Rosberg claimed his fifth Formula 1 pole position in a row by narrowly defeating Mercedes team-mate Lewis Hamilton in qualifying for the Brazilian Grand Prix at Interlagos.

Is this a participation in the real competition -- Q1, Q2, etc being the consequtive rounds before a final -- or is it an ongoing effort into determining who qualifies for participating in the competition? If the former, does the article need to be more clear about which rounds are over and which aren't, and which rounds are the article subject?

--Gryllida 21:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Review of revision 3977821 [Passed]

Revision 3977821 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I had trouble with various background details that I couldn't find in the sources. Most of them I later discovered in background links from the sources. A few I never did find. A couple of details didn't check out — Vettel's relative time, and who got the ten-place penalty. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 3977821 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I had trouble with various background details that I couldn't find in the sources. Most of them I later discovered in background links from the sources. A few I never did find. A couple of details didn't check out — Vettel's relative time, and who got the ten-place penalty. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.