Talk:Muguruza defeats Williams to win her first Grand Slam title in French Open

@Pi zero: Just before you are done with the review, can you add this line "Serena lost two Grand Slam Finals this year, losing Aus Open to Angelique Kerber, losing two sets to love." Related news "Kerber wins over Serena Williams 6-4 3-6 6-4 in Aus Open 2016" — Wikinews, January 30, 2016.
acagastya 15:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Oops, 2-1
acagastya 16:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Review of revision 4222300 [Passed]

Revision 4222300 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Had to cut a number of things I wasn't able to verify; if something is not going to be straightforward to find, but is there, it's really important to provide some help for reviewers, such as a note on the collaboration page, or an embedded html comment<!-- like this -->. Fixed some neutrality problems: avoid analysis, and assertions about what people feel (which we can't actually know). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4222300 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Had to cut a number of things I wasn't able to verify; if something is not going to be straightforward to find, but is there, it's really important to provide some help for reviewers, such as a note on the collaboration page, or an embedded html comment<!-- like this -->. Fixed some neutrality problems: avoid analysis, and assertions about what people feel (which we can't actually know). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Edit protected

{{editprotected}} please add {{clear}} before the scorecard to avoid the splitting. (At the moment, the CSS isn't perfect)
acagastya 08:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

That adds an enormous amount of white-space to the article when viewed with a browser on a computer. I don't know what it looks like on a mobile or whatever device you are using. Cheers, --SVTCobra 20:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Added just a bit of additional vertical whitespace. --Pi zero (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@Pi zero: do you find it would be better to say "at" in place of "in".
•–• 06:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

@Acagastya: In the headline? I think it means the same thing either way, and either sounds plausible. So I wouldn't fiddle with it at this point. The article body also appears consistent with the current headline usage. --Pi zero (talk) 11:43, 14 July 2019 (UTC)