Talk:Men isolated to mimic Mars flight
Review of revision 1037522 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1037522 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I'm sorry but this reads more like a personal essay than a news article. It needs a serious copyedit and the penultimate paragraph seems overly critical of the mission. In addition, it's not clear throughout the article that this isn't a "real" spaceflight. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1037522 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I'm sorry but this reads more like a personal essay than a news article. It needs a serious copyedit and the penultimate paragraph seems overly critical of the mission. In addition, it's not clear throughout the article that this isn't a "real" spaceflight. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- The fact that females are not included in the mission appears in at least to of the sources as far as I can remember. I don't see how it is 'critical' of the mission - simply stating that certain parameters cannot be tested does not mean the mission is useless! Besides, the last sentence already addresses why it's not a particularly good idea to bring both men and women. Kayau (talk · contribs) 23:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Chinese source
editIs the chinese-language source absolutely essential? I'm afraid, unsurprisingly, I know nothing of the language. I do not trust Google translate to do a good enough job to fact-check from the article. It would be much, much better to not have foreign language sources for stuff like this; they are an enormous barrier to a competent review. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- The Chinese source is the only one that mentions the 'astronauts' actually entering the room. Kayau (talk · contribs) 12:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1039190 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1039190 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1039190 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |