Talk:Japanese military helicopter goes down at sea, 10 missing
 |
This article has been syndicated here by WallStreetWindow. |
Notes for reviewer edit
This ought to be a simple review as there's not much to it (although tragic). I went with JGSDF as the acronym instead of GSDF as used in a source, merely because it seems to be Wiki-consistent. Cheers, SVTCobra 19:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: Wouldn't you consider the finding of the debris, as mentioned later in the article, to be a significant enough event to necessitate refocusing? Heavy Water (talk) 20:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- It was reported on the same day (well, US time anyway). If you don't think it can be reviewed I will look for more updates. SVTCobra 00:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Review of revision 4720833 [Passed] edit
 |
Revision 4720833 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good article. I guess a developing story (in the sense other agencies use it) is an instance one can't always have the source articles share the same focal event (the AP, especially, practices slash-and-burn rewriting instead of writing new articles). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4720833 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good article. I guess a developing story (in the sense other agencies use it) is an instance one can't always have the source articles share the same focal event (the AP, especially, practices slash-and-burn rewriting instead of writing new articles). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |