Talk:Japan government panel urges reinterpretation of pacifist constitution
Review of revision 2380568 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 2380568 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 2380568 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Note, this article is, so I understand, a rearrangement of material from Wikinews Shorts: February 4, 2014, by User:Jjbayes. --Pi zero (talk) 00:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
It is; I should've possibly noted that on this talk page also. I have addressed the sourcing problem, inherited from the briefs. Surprisingly I couldn't locate the news on NK's newspaper website. (I can read the alphabet, and their English and Korean versions appear to be the same content-wise, but nothing similar to the Hitler thing came to my view; I'm trying to locate it, now, to find who to attribute the claim to, if possible.) --Gryllida 01:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Review of revision 2382380 [Passed]
edit
Revision 2382380 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 2382380 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |