Talk:India launches Small Satellite Launch Vehicle, deploying three low-earth orbit satellites
Name
edit@DRC-B5: I think this article could use a rename to something more informative, perhaps mentioning the name of the satellite/where it's going/what it will do (also it should be "orbit" not "the orbit"). Heavy Water (talk) 04:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Heavy Water, shall we name it as "ISRO launches SSLV-D2, deploying 3 satellites including EOS-07 into orbit" DRC-B5 (talk) 04:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Saying "India" is better because we can't assume people will know what the ISRO is, and for the same reason, it's better to spell out "Small Satellite Launch Vehicle". And on second thought, maybe we should remove "including EOS-07" and specify low-earth orbit; the satellite name is meaningless if one doesn't already know it. Heavy Water (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, then @Heavy Water, it should be renamed as "India launches Small Satellite Launch Vehicle, deploying 3 low-earth orbit satellites" DRC-B5 (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra, please fix the rename issue. I accidentally changed only the talk page. I can't move the main page. DRC-B5 (talk) 09:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was a little messy, but I think it is fixed. If you see any other redirects still floating around, please tag them for speedy. SVTCobra 14:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra, please fix the rename issue. I accidentally changed only the talk page. I can't move the main page. DRC-B5 (talk) 09:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, then @Heavy Water, it should be renamed as "India launches Small Satellite Launch Vehicle, deploying 3 low-earth orbit satellites" DRC-B5 (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Saying "India" is better because we can't assume people will know what the ISRO is, and for the same reason, it's better to spell out "Small Satellite Launch Vehicle". And on second thought, maybe we should remove "including EOS-07" and specify low-earth orbit; the satellite name is meaningless if one doesn't already know it. Heavy Water (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
@Heavy Water:, regarding the last rename, are the three satellites not deployed yet? The second paragraph seems to say they are. --SVTCobra 17:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I was looking at the third paragraph: "In this new rocket, ISRO will attempt to sent three satellites..." Apparently that was not updated to reflect that they were deployed. All the sources except the Indian Express did update, so apparently it has happened. Heavy Water (talk) 19:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: As soon as India launches Small Satellite Launch Vehicle, deploying three low-earth orbit satellites is deleted, I will self-revert. Heavy Water (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I did it as I can do it in one step. SVTCobra 19:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: As soon as India launches Small Satellite Launch Vehicle, deploying three low-earth orbit satellites is deleted, I will self-revert. Heavy Water (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- So can you update that third paragraph, DRC-B5? Heavy Water (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Review of revision 4709091 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4709091 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Please do read the edit history, you will find much to learn there. A few sentences I had to remove entirely because there was no mention of their material in the sources, and I did some editing for distance from source. NPOV worked out great though; style was probably complicated by the poor English of the sources, but there were far fewer style issues than the balloon article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4709091 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Please do read the edit history, you will find much to learn there. A few sentences I had to remove entirely because there was no mention of their material in the sources, and I did some editing for distance from source. NPOV worked out great though; style was probably complicated by the poor English of the sources, but there were far fewer style issues than the balloon article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |