Talk:High Court of Australia dismisses appeal against conviction, compulsory voting

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Gryllida in topic OR

Will submit the story for review once a transcript and/or judgment text is available online, I think, on Monday. Gryllida 12:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OR edit

Forwarded data to scoop that supports the following bits in the article:

  • The Court had no documentation of their reasoning beyond the verbal pronouncement on the day.
  • Anders Holmdahl had decided to take the case before the United Nations Human Rights Council.

--Gryllida 00:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Two more details:

  • The Court had no documentation of their reasoning beyond the verbal pronouncement on the day (from the Court itself yesterday);
  • There is no photo of a Judge available for the article for safety reasons (today).

Also forwarded to scoop. Gryllida 08:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Can some more background information be added to this article? I have no idea what it is about. 129.120.3.3 (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Hi. Thanks for your feedback. I added a note about how elections in Australia work at the article bottom. Is there some specific point that complicates understanding or affects readability? Gryllida 23:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Review of revision 1878742 [Passed] edit

Return to "High Court of Australia dismisses appeal against conviction, compulsory voting" page.