Talk:Facebook acquires Instagram for US$1 billion

Review of revision 1463621 [Not ready]

Revision 1463621 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: NPOV: Reads like an advertisement. Style: Do not put external links in the text. Do use {{w}} to put wikilinks in the text, following the style guide on how much to link. Start with a lede succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the basic questions about the news event, and proceed using inverted pyramid style. Clarifying the significance of the event should be a very high priority; it would be odd if the lede did not make this at least preliminarily clear in succinctly answering the basic questions. Near dates in the text should be relative, per WN:SG#Days. More distant dates, and dates in the Sources section, should use house-standard format per WN:SG#Dates. Review did not proceed beyond these points, so what else may be lurking is unknown. (In theory this should go without saying, but, just to be clear.) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1463621 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: NPOV: Reads like an advertisement. Style: Do not put external links in the text. Do use {{w}} to put wikilinks in the text, following the style guide on how much to link. Start with a lede succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the basic questions about the news event, and proceed using inverted pyramid style. Clarifying the significance of the event should be a very high priority; it would be odd if the lede did not make this at least preliminarily clear in succinctly answering the basic questions. Near dates in the text should be relative, per WN:SG#Days. More distant dates, and dates in the Sources section, should use house-standard format per WN:SG#Dates. Review did not proceed beyond these points, so what else may be lurking is unknown. (In theory this should go without saying, but, just to be clear.) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

I hope to have addressed the issues mentioned above, as well as expanding the article in length and adding additional sources. For ease of reviewing, the sources for each portion of the story have been added at HTML comments. MyNameWasTaken (talk) 06:19, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I made additional comments inside the text in html comment form and on the user's talk page. Crtew (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1466183 [Passed]

Revision 1466183 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1466183 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.