Talk:European Space Agency's Euclid telescope launches from Florida, US
Review of revision 4735035 [Passed] edit
 |
Revision 4735035 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Ixfd64: Thanks for making this an easy review. Main issues were passive voice and WN:TENSE. It would also be great if you could incorporate more details (and quotes) from the NASA press release — that would help demonstrate how cool this is. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4735035 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Ixfd64: Thanks for making this an easy review. Main issues were passive voice and WN:TENSE. It would also be great if you could incorporate more details (and quotes) from the NASA press release — that would help demonstrate how cool this is. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- No problem. I'm a bit busy in real life right now but will try to add more information about NASA involvement before the 24-hour cutoff for "significant" changes. --Ixfd64 (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Bharath1704j (talk) 05:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC) The L2 (second Lagrage point) is not between the Sun and the Earth. L2 is between Earth and Mars. Check this image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope#/media/File:L2_rendering.jpg
- Ugh. You're right. Thanks. It's my fault for not remembering that or correcting it against the BBC and Space.com sources. I've put a {{correction}} up. Heavy Water (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- I was using a Reuters article as a source when I wrote this. It looks like the Reuters source is wrong. --Ixfd64 (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)