Talk:English football: Arsène Wenger to leave Arsenal at season end

Review of revision 4401010 [Passed]

Revision 4401010 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4401010 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Issue correction

{{issue correction}}

Arsenal won the league, undefeated in 2003-04; not 2002-03. See the table of both the seasons -- select using a drop down menu "filter by season". ManUtd won in 2002-2003; Arsenal won in the next season, and "lost" column says zero.
•–• 21:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Before we issue the correction, are we sure the rest of that sentence is correct? Are they in fact the only team in the long history of the Premier League to go undefeated for the season? --SVTCobra 22:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, they are.
•–• 22:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

BBC seems to think it also happened in 1888-89. --SVTCobra 22:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

And "Premier League" was established in 1992.
•–• 22:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Template can be removed when it is reviewed. --SVTCobra 22:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
shouldn’t that be above date template?
103.254.128.130 (talk) 22:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Looking through several previously corrected articles, there seems to be plenty of examples to have it above and below. Does it really matter? I was used to the idea that {{date}} should always be the very first thing in any article. --SVTCobra 22:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

The layout screws up when it is below the date template.
103.254.128.130 (talk) 22:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Imho, the format of the correction template does seem to work better when it has the full width of the page to work with. --Pi zero (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2018 (UTC)