Talk:Emir of Qatar abdicates throne
Review of revision 1933877 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 1933877 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1933877 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1934007 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 1934007 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: On the NPOV front, saying a country is "a major force in the dynamic political balances in the region" is sort of the nationalistic equivalent of advertising-style puffery - that's the sort of thing that actually needs to have a source - we should say that some important person X, like an academic or, say, a President or prime minister of an unconnected nation thinks that. But it seems likely that it was probably plagiarized from the Telegraph source. I didn't check the FT source as it requires registration, and the Al-Jazeera source is in Arabic. While non-English sources are allowed on Wikinews, they do make reviewing harder - so if you are going to use them, it's well worth specifying on the talk page exactly what facts you are sourcing to the non-English source, and providing translation. The image also needs a caption and an attribution using the {{Image}} template. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1934007 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: On the NPOV front, saying a country is "a major force in the dynamic political balances in the region" is sort of the nationalistic equivalent of advertising-style puffery - that's the sort of thing that actually needs to have a source - we should say that some important person X, like an academic or, say, a President or prime minister of an unconnected nation thinks that. But it seems likely that it was probably plagiarized from the Telegraph source. I didn't check the FT source as it requires registration, and the Al-Jazeera source is in Arabic. While non-English sources are allowed on Wikinews, they do make reviewing harder - so if you are going to use them, it's well worth specifying on the talk page exactly what facts you are sourcing to the non-English source, and providing translation. The image also needs a caption and an attribution using the {{Image}} template. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1934851 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 1934851 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1934851 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Also, the article says "... is believed ..." This is a broad assertion; who believes this? Is someone making this claim? --Pi zero (talk) 18:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback Pi zero. I have done the best I could to update the article, however, the majority of sources about this specific story are in Arabic with a few English Language sources.--MDChaara (talk) 19:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Review of revision 1937324 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1937324 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1937324 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |