Talk:Drunken man is surprised crocodile bit him

Review of revision 1059795 [Failed]

Revision 1059795 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: 'Dumb-dee', His first trip to the taven, and being removed from an earlier bar are not sourced. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1059795 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: 'Dumb-dee', His first trip to the taven, and being removed from an earlier bar are not sourced. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Paragraphs 9 and 10 of The Australian piece are sources for the nickname, the tavern ejection, and the return visit. --InfantGorilla (talk) 11:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1059852 [Passed]

Revision 1059852 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I seriously missed that RE talk page The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1059852 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I seriously missed that RE talk page The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Requested copyedit

(moved from comments)

Missing close single quotation mark. If I could simply edit this like the name “wiki” would normally suggest, I could have just gone in and fixed it! —The preceding comment was added by Timwi (talk • contribs) 19:09, 15 December 2010

Exactly as on Wikipedia, a request to edit a fully protected page should be on the talk page and use {{editprotected}}. This and the reason for protection are explained by the notice at the bottom of the article, which please read.

Your requested copyedit to the article is consistent with our archival policy. Done --Pi zero (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)