Talk:Comic Relief funds allegedly invested in arms, alcohol and tobacco firms

Comment

• The lede doesn't address basic question when. This can likely be addressed within the purview of a reviewer, at their discretion. [Note: the critical when for newsworthiness is the when of the focus, which here is the Parnorama broadcast.]

--Pi zero (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

• Done —Tom Morris (talk) 19:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 2227812 [Passed]

Revision 2227812 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I added two sources—one to address the issue of when as User:Pi zero raised. I also added a source for Comic Relief being founded in 1985, which isn't covered in the existing sources but was covered in the Daily Mirror writeup. I feel both of these things are within the scope of reviewer discretion. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2227812 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I added two sources—one to address the issue of when as User:Pi zero raised. I also added a source for Comic Relief being founded in 1985, which isn't covered in the existing sources but was covered in the Daily Mirror writeup. I feel both of these things are within the scope of reviewer discretion. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Misspelling in headline

"allegeldy" should be "allegedly". 86.160.126.67 (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Done --Pi zero (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

This doesn't need to say allegedly!

There are documents proving this, and Comic relief hasn't denied it, so I think 'allegedly' should be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iamsorandom (talk • contribs) 17:28, 31 January 2014‎

A news article is a snapshot in time. Substantive changes to an article can only be made within 24 hours after we publish it. After that, if the article contains an error, we can put a {{correction}} notice on it; but in this case, as I understand it, what you're describing isn't an error, so doesn't warrant a correction. --Pi zero (talk) 17:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)