Talk:Cardiff student union calls for cancellation of lecture by Germaine Greer

Review of revision 3924029 [Not ready]

Revision 3924029 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 06:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See copyvio concerns, below. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A bit too much quoting, per analysis at https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikinews&title=Cardiff+student+union+calls+for+cancellation+of+lecture+by+%27transmisogynistic%27+Germaine+Greer&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=0&use_links=1 Please try to trim down quotations by trimming, removing quotes, and/or paraphrasing. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 3924029 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 06:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See copyvio concerns, below. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A bit too much quoting, per analysis at https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikinews&title=Cardiff+student+union+calls+for+cancellation+of+lecture+by+%27transmisogynistic%27+Germaine+Greer&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=0&use_links=1 Please try to trim down quotations by trimming, removing quotes, and/or paraphrasing. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 3924437 [Passed]

Revision 3924437 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 3924437 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Wellington, New Zealand

@Pi zero: It is a mere redirect to Wellington, And if there would be any new Wellington, those Wikipedians would name it Wellington (known for what peculiarity)
14.139.242.195 (talk) 18:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, they would. But for news, imho, it's a better mindset to qualify more often than not. Wikipedia, you see, as a matter of principle, assigns the unadorned name to the single most famous thing of that name, going by the Wikipedian community's subjective judgement of fame, and then if there are other things of that name, they put a hatnote on the article directing readers who wanted something else. For example, Wikipedia article Tripoli is about the city in Libya, and a hatnote says for other uses see Tripoli (disambiguation). But on Wikinews, we want to minimize subjective judgements about importance and we want to make our links go directly to the right place so we want to know right away if there's more than one. So on Wikinews, Tripoli is actually a disambiguation page, directing the user to either Category:Tripoli, Libya or Category:Tripoli, Lebanon. --Pi zero (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)