Talk:British airport closed after small jet transporting transplant organ crashes

Broadcast notes

Anything that is not in the sources was sourced from Sky News' television channel, which I am monitoring for updates. wackywace 17:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

All flights suspended

Two injured

In and out

One critically "Two fire engines rushing across" "we've been told the airport is closed" "on the edges of the runway" "crashed on apporoach"

"Think, dense fog" "cannot see anything." "see nothing but a few lights and that's all." "keeping people in check-in back" Cessna aircraft "walking wounded" "major incident"

Strange angle, skidded, caught fire "taken to hospital with serious injuries."

Organ was transported to hospital, operation successfully carried out.

Aircraft was approaching at "odd angle", "skidded", caught fire

Registration: G-VUEM (Additional research showed aircraft is Cessna Citation 501)

Markham interview

"alerted to what was described as a 'hard landing' at the airport"

"The airport authorities are actively involved with us"

"small fire within the aircraft"

Plane carrying organ for transplantation.

Organ still viable.

"Visibility appalling"

Visibility will "slow things down"

"thorough investigation"

"It would appear the aircraft came down on landing and soon after there was a small fire within the aircraft. There were two casualties on board the plane. One we believe is in serious condition and has been airlifted to hospital; and the second one has been taken to hospital but with less significant injuries."

Review of revision 1131422 [Failed]

Revision 1131422 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: I'm not happy with the broadcast report notes. It isn't enough to say 'if it's not here, it's there' - that's how inaccurate info slips through. Please list what Sky said on the talk, so any discrepencies are clear. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1131422 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: I'm not happy with the broadcast report notes. It isn't enough to say 'if it's not here, it's there' - that's how inaccurate info slips through. Please list what Sky said on the talk, so any discrepencies are clear. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1131657 [Passed]

Revision 1131657 of this article has been reviewed by Bobby122 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good now that it has gotten a c/e and the notes are up. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1131657 of this article has been reviewed by Bobby122 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good now that it has gotten a c/e and the notes are up. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Added source for additional confirmation

I'd like to understand this pre-publish edit better. What was being confirmed — something that the pre-existing sources (counting OR) conflicted each other on? something they omitted? something they mentioned, but that seemed worth being especially sure of? --Pi zero (talk) 12:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

I couldn't find the last quote on the page in the OR or the sources. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 16:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)