Talk:'Invitational Games for the Deaf, Taipei 2008': Review of soccer preliminaries

OR

This is one of main events I mostly respected after a big strike in the first day. I witnessed the event today but hardly to take photo (a good news: my DC was recovered, and my charger and adapter were also fixed :D) because of its scale (large and wide).

The officials also confirmed that the final standing will be listed at the final day after the soccer events ends, before this, I will also do the recap for martial art events (many surprise, especially more sudden KOs) and table tennis.

This is the 3rd day briefing, tomorrow is their official resting day, information for what I mentioned will be updated tomorrow. Brock ^contact... 15:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review 1

Revision 690147 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Needs C/E - some sections are very confusing (IE: "Nearly a group of death"). Also "Unpredictable soccer event" - Title could use some work. Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 18:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 690147 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Needs C/E - some sections are very confusing (IE: "Nearly a group of death"). Also "Unpredictable soccer event" - Title could use some work. Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 18:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Style

I did some fixes on my title and content, please make proper reviews, regards. Brock ^contact... 07:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review 2

Revision 690501 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Still needs a thorough copyedit by a someone before this is put back to review status. Comments by reviewer: I've fixed what I can and will try to fix more, but it needs work. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 690501 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Still needs a thorough copyedit by a someone before this is put back to review status. Comments by reviewer: I've fixed what I can and will try to fix more, but it needs work. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

...and spelling in the title ... --SVTCobra 14:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review 3

Revision 690779 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks great now. Thanks to Chris Mann for the major work. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 690779 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks great now. Thanks to Chris Mann for the major work. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Just a note that I sighted the publish revision because it wasn't showing up on the Main Page. I'm going to assume that's not a breach of our current publishing practice (and I daresay Calebrw would have sighted if he'd noticed). Chris Mann (Say hi!|Stalk me!) 12:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)