Comments:The Raveonettes on love, death, desire and war

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Sverdrup in topic Great Interview

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

What an odd and interesting interview! They really have a unique view of the world. They underestimate terrorism, the reason there aren't terrorists in were they live is because governments work to stop them. But I have to admire their view on Chechnya. The Russians are just as bad as they were in the cold war, too bad that war ended in a truce rather than in victory. Contralya 16:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great Interview edit

Well done with a great interview.

I saw both the Southpaw and Bowery Ballroom shows.

I loved all the answers Sharin & Sune gave here. Though I don't necessarily agree with all of their opinions, I find them to be two of the most honest and intelligent people out there.

I think I find their thoughts on time travel and the fourth dimenion the most amusing of all!

11:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Dave Cromwell

Really great interview, first-class quality! And the photos are well crafted too. Funny I should find this so late (and re-discover raveonettes so late). Sverdrup - (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia selling out edit

My life, so much for objectivity on Wikipedia. I realise Wikinews is a seperate project, but the two overlap and use the same format and it gives the wrong impression. For one thing, it makes the Wiki foundation look less like an alturistic organisation and more like a corporation. Secondly, the moment u let PR people influence one section, they will b looking to influence wikipedia articles too and it generates a conflcit of interests. It may even explain why this band have such a ridiculously long entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]