Comments:Senate publish report on CIA torture and misinformation

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
This is new?415:03, 9 January 2015

This is new?

Not to downplay the importance of this, just a question...what was said in this report that wasn't already known? Fephisto (talk) 13:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Fephisto (talk)13:12, 11 December 2014

It's analogue to the case with Snowden. We actually already knew, but now we know for sure. And for the people that have interest in hiding this truth, it becomes a lot harder to cover up the truth.

Edoderoo (talk)13:50, 11 December 2014

When a country does something really bad, the population may later have a hard time admitting it happened. For some it's cover-up, but for many it's just plain denial. With no clear line between the two; when you've got enough of a personal investment of belief in what was done, denial can edge over into cover-up so quietly you don't notice (at the time, anyway).

Pi zero (talk)14:18, 11 December 2014

.....uhm...are we talking about the same things? I'm not saying, "This is something we all guessed about but didn't know for sure." This is something that there was already news and official reports about: ...since at least 2007, right? Fephisto (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Fephisto (talk)15:03, 9 January 2015