Comments:Obama, Romney battle over foreign policy in final U.S. presidential debate
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Comments from feedback form - "everything on this is bull shi..." | 1 | 00:50, 1 November 2012 |
| This article is inaccurate and biased in favor of bipartisanship. | 2 | 00:32, 27 October 2012 |
| Comments from feedback form - "great!" | 0 | 14:13, 26 October 2012 |
Final debate?
- http://freeandequal.org/updates/winners-of-october-23-presidential-debate/
- http://nader.org/2012/10/25/ralph-nader-to-host-third-party-presidential-debate-in-d-c-114/
IMHO this article violates the NPOV policy of Wikinews.
I find the reference to WN:NPOV a severely overblown accusation. This is a minor clarification. It's "the" third debate in the sense that it's Obama and Romney's third debate, which is clear from context but there's no harm in changing "the" to "their". Frankly, if a change of meaning were required, a {{correction}} notice would be required as it's been more than 24 hours since publication.