Comments:New BP oil spill plan

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.


40% Chance Of FailureEdit

Well I guess when the golf balls don't work, the next logical step is to fill it with mud... In other news BP is buying 50 "Tonka Trucks" to deliver the payload of mud.  Travis "TeamColtra" McCrea - (T)(C) 08:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "This is some of the worst tras..."

This is some of the worst trash I have ever read in my life. This article is a disgrace. (talk)08:24, 22 June 2010

Hi, please move those comments to Talk:New_BP_oil_spill_plan.

Kayau (talk · contribs)08:56, 22 June 2010

Comments from feedback form - "this is so bad and unreliable,..."

this is so bad and unreliable, this is a poor effort (talk)08:21, 22 June 2010

Comments from feedback form - "This is horrible. :| The oil ..."

Edited by 2 users.
Last edit: 09:55, 27 May 2010

This is horrible. :| The oil spill, I mean -- the article was very well written and brought out. (talk)22:45, 25 May 2010