Comments:Dozens dead in Connecticut school shooting

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Type of rifle113:34, 19 October 2014
Comments from feedback form - "..."023:18, 27 January 2013
Comments from feedback form - "There's no such thing as an "a..."005:27, 27 December 2012
Comments from feedback form - "It's all wrong"103:26, 22 December 2012
Comments from feedback form - "more info plzz"013:35, 18 December 2012
Comments from feedback form - "Contradictions and factual err..."217:25, 15 December 2012

Type of rifle

.223 assault rifle needs to be changed to armalite rifle. Assault rifles require a class 3 license/stamp and also have select fire. His gun was a semi automatic .223 rifle. He did not have a assault rifle, it was an armalite rifle.

Jjulian421 (talk)13:11, 19 October 2014

Can you provide sourcing for this? Web links? We can provide an additional {{correction}} on this point if we have solid documentation. (As I recall, I investigated this question after the previous comment, below, but the definition of "assault rifle" appeared to be ambiguous with different definitions floating around.) We cannot, of course, simply change the wording if it's wrong, because that would be rewriting history to cover up a publication error, and we don't do that.

Pi zero (talk)13:34, 19 October 2014
 

Comments from feedback form - "..."

...

76.64.23.85 (talk)23:18, 27 January 2013

Comments from feedback form - "There's no such thing as an "a..."

There's no such thing as an "assault rifle" as all rifles can be used for 'assault'

72.228.152.197 (talk)05:27, 27 December 2012

Comments from feedback form - "It's all wrong"

It's all wrong

108.46.172.164 (talk)03:08, 22 December 2012

Too vague to act on. Specifically, what is wrong? (If you're thinking of the number 28, btw, no it's not wrong.)

Pi zero (talk)03:26, 22 December 2012
 

Comments from feedback form - "more info plzz"

more info plzz

66.249.113.70 (talk)13:35, 18 December 2012

Comments from feedback form - "Contradictions and factual err..."

Contradictions and factual errors seem evident compared with wikipedia article and other sources. Presented as recent/updated/breaking. Seems old and erroneous instead.

97.83.16.196 (talk)16:04, 15 December 2012

And yet, you are apparently unable to name a single thing that is supposedly a factual error, let alone attempt to correct it (the article being less than 24 hours hold is not yet under the archive policy, for another three hours or so as I write this).

Pi zero (talk)17:14, 15 December 2012

I do agree this is no longer breaking (something else you are apparently able to complain about but not able to attempt to remedy).

Pi zero (talk)17:25, 15 December 2012