Wikinews talk:Briefs/March 24, 2012

Script status

I've reviewed each item in the script, and made some changes to each (except in one case I think my only edit was typesetting, with no effect on the audio).

Unfortunately, the item on Savage on Santorum on Savage was seriously flawed, and I pulled it. If it's to be included, it would need a complete rewrite, and then rechecked of course. The first sentence was vague, the middle only mentioned things Santorum had said about Savage, and the end wans't even grammatical (one suspects something might have gone wrong during editing). Apparently, a brief of that article ought to say something about remarks by each, and say something about the history of the neologism (though it wouldn't make any sense to recite the definition; if nothing else, that would be excessively long). --Pi zero (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1446165 [Passed]

Revision 1446165 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A learning experience, perhaps: The passage "apparent victims of the Mexican drug war" has ended up ambiguous, in that it could refer either to the twelve police, or to the ten people whose bodies they were looking for. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1446165 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A learning experience, perhaps: The passage "apparent victims of the Mexican drug war" has ended up ambiguous, in that it could refer either to the twelve police, or to the ten people whose bodies they were looking for. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.