Wikinews

Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Thunderhead 2

< Wikinews:Requests for permissions | Administrator
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

User:Thunderhead

edit

I am going to nominate myself for another RFA as per my RFA test.

I may not have written but a few articles, however I feel that my contributions to Wikinews have been significant enough that you may trust me with administrative privlages. I missed consensus by two votes which were both oppose. I have, however worked things out with PVJ. I feel that Wikinews may not be short on administrators, that we need to continually maintain anti-vandal administrators so that we can continually fight the War on Vandalisim. I hope that the Wikinews community will recognize Special:Contributions/Thunderhead my contributions to the project. If I do not recieve adminship this time, I will try again in February 2007. To avoid confusion, my previous username was User:Urameshi2. Questions are always welcome. Thunderhead(talk)(Check out my RFA test) 23:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support There is nothing bad to say about you or your edits. I trust you to be admin. FellowWikiNews (W) 23:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment I wrote on your test Good luck in February, since this is not February. I implied that I would support you in February (since that's when you said you would run again). You lied Thunderhead! In case you don't know it, this is November, February is 3 months away. I stand by my decision on your test. Good luck in February terinjokes User Page / Talk 03:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support-- Zeest(Talk)(Newpages) 07:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral - I honestly believe that the user needs to place far less importance on becoming an admin (per RfA Test, Peer Review, previous nominations) and slow down - concentrate on getting some more good articles done before ladening yourself with admin tasks. I would support a nomination in February. --Skenmy(t•c•w•i) 09:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support--Nearly Headless Nick 16:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose. Thunderhead has been an enthusiastic contributor, particularly active in discussions. but i don't see contributions to articles, project pages or discussions that highlight his understanding of policies (have i missed something?). the user's relatively low proportion of contributions to main and project space and relatively high prop. on user and user talk pages has also weighed in my take on this. perhaps the user can point out contributions he feels are notable or demonstrate his ability to use the buttons well.  — Doldrums(talk) 15:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
some rather odd edits as well, [1], [2], [3].  — Doldrums(talk) 15:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose : to early, need some months of fun on wikinews !Jacques Divol 09:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of the Admin's page or the talk page of the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/Thunderhead_2&oldid=1074614"