Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Millosh

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Millosh (talk · contribs)

I am mostly active at sr.wn and I am working on its infrastructure. A couple of days ago I am asked to make bots for en.wn. I need admin permissions mostly for page deletion because of dealing with bots. As a steward I have necessary permissions, but I need community consensus to use them. So, both options are good enough for me: (1) to have local admin permissions or (2) to have approval from the community to use my existing admin-related permissions which I have as a steward. --millosh (talk) 11:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and questions

Comment Since you're trusted as a steward, and can take admin rights, the only other thing is editor rights. Administrators are generally trusted to handle these and it's effectively automatic with admin. As you are not too involved in the daily work on enwn with these tools are you happy to forego peer reviewing articles? Obviously, if you see vandalism, it's better you can revert to a sighted version where one exists. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 12:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Any technical work which I am able to do is not a problem. As I am working now on bots for en.wn, I am watching en.wn RC more often; so, if I see any vandalism, I'll revert it, as well as I may help with blocking [obvious] vandals and spammers. At the other side, my involvement at the most of Wikimedia projects is structural, which means that I am not an editor anywhere in the narrow sense. Even thou I wanted (and I want) to make interviews and to participate more in writing, I don't have enough of time for that (actually, I've made less than 10 real stories in Serbian since I've started to take care about sr.wn in 2007). In other words, I am good as a bureaucrat and not so useful as a journalist or encyclopedist. --millosh (talk) 15:18, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support Thoughtful and well-presented response to my question above, already trusted to manage bots, and has privs elsewhere. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 15:39, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support he can't do any more damage than he already is. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 15:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support giving him +sysop locally. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per Brian McNeil (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tempodivalse [talk] 20:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tris 20:33, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adambro (talk) 07:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support we trust him with the tools as a steward, no reason to not give him them locally. --Cspurrier (talk) 00:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.