Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/LauraHale

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closing as successful since it's been two weeks and all votes occurred on the first day of the nomination and there have been none since other than Will's somewhat ambiguous withdrawal of support. Making it a 4-1 consenus. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 05:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LauraHale (talk · contribs) — adminship

Let's see... where to start? Piles upon piles of original OR work all of which has been published, aside from one at this time, which is still pending review. Is accredited. Has flagged revs permisson. And last week, she helped me prune the Newsroom by nominating various spam and nonsense articles with speedy delete tags. Granted, she could have done that herself had she had the mop and bucket. And I think it's by time we give her that right. ;) Plus... it's been six months since we last have an admin nomination, it's high time for one. ;) :P --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 17:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

Links for LauraHale: LauraHale (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · review log · lu)

Questions and comments

Question Laura, do you accept the nomination? --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 17:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I accept. --20:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Question As with most nominations and our highly informal vetting process... we must ask: What are your plans for world domination? --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World domination starts with Australia and then moves eastward towards New Zealand. If I can't get a visa to stay in Australia, I'd like to get a kickstart grant and do Wikinews coverage on Oceania because I love the region and we don't get enough news. --LauraHale (talk) 04:50, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support of course, as nom. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 17:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming acceptance, support. Shouldn't need to go into great detail to justify this, Laura 'fits' with the Wikinews community and by-and-large has a clue what news is. I'd trust her with mob, bucket, and spam-tenderizing ban-hammer. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 18:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Good user.--~~William S. Saturn (talk) 18:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)~~, but latest submission makes me question if she understands newsworthiness.--William S. Saturn (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Laura's always pretty much right on the money. Intelligent, competent, and trustworthy. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:36, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If she accepts. Nominee would only use superpowers for Good. I'd wait before voting, pro forma, for acceptance of nom, but evidently we're not doing that on this one. --Pi zero (talk) 19:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.