Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Brianmc 2
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
I'd like to nominate brianmc for adminship. He's a tireless researcher, working on in-depth articles (such as the ongoing research about Greg Lloyd Smith) and covering a topic extensively (such as the Southern Thailand insurgency and here). He has done a lot of copyediting and working on community pages as well as great RC-patroling. I believe he would be a good asset for the community. - Amgine | talk en.WN 20:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Accepted. I know there were a few concerns last time round, but I think if those minor cases are taken in the context of an entire year's editing, then I've demonstrated I can make a positive contribution as an Administrator. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC) (and I'm human, notice the spelling mistake I had to correct.)[reply]
- Support--Cspurrier 20:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--SonicR 21:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Deprifry|+T+ 22:26, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. He already assumes some of the cleaning responsibility :). --MrMiscellanious (talk) – 22:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Has done good work. Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 23:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Vocal and straight-forward. -Edbrown05 23:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --vonbergm 23:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - sinblox (talk) 03:45, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --TUFKAAP 15:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nyarlathotep 15:44, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Hey, he does the business! :-) Spum 10:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Does more admin work then some of the admins. Bawolff ☺☻ 21:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Of course!--Eloquence 22:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. -- IlyaHaykinson 06:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - sinblox (talk) 00:41, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.