User talk:Michael Simpson~enwikinews/Controversy:Should banning on the wikis be legal
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Neutralizer in topic NPOV
NPOV edit
This article violates the WN:NPOV policy, in that it asserts opinions without ascribing them, asserts facts without sources, and is a rhetorical argument rather than reporting a news event (an editorial.) The article also is unsourced as to its factual statements, is not a news event at all, and desperately needs editorial cleanup, but I don't think multi-tagging is appropriate. - Amgine | talk en.WN 18:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Lets not start running stories about every dispute in the wikipedia community. We should have had a story about the userbox war, but I'm not sure there is enough here for a real story anyway. So a notnews tag is probably reasonable. Nyarlathotep 19:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that the notnews tag is appropriate; the article doesn't make enough sense to me to qualify for a NPOV tag. Neutralizer 20:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)