User talk:Jnmornout/Rare USI Inspiration Award given

Email with Jon Mark Hall, Director of Athletics at University of Southern Indiana

File:Jon Mark Hall email 1.PNG

Email with Jon Mark Hall, Director of Athletics at USI. Part 1.

File:Jon Mark Hall email 2.PNG

Email with Jon Mark Hall, Director of Athletics at USI. Part 2.

Text message interview with Darla Goffinet, mother of Sarah Goffinet

File:Text message interview with Darla Goffinet part 1.PNG

Text message interview with Darla Goffinet. Part 1.

File:Text message interview with Darla Goffinet part 2.PNG

Text message interview with Darla Goffinet. Part 2.

File:Text message interview with Darla Goffinet.PNG

Text message interview with Darla Goffinet. Part 3.

File:Text message interview with Darla Goffinet.PNG

Text message interview with Darla Goffinet. Part 4.

Interview notes from interview with Darla Goffinet

File:Interview Notes Darla Goffinet.JPG

Details of Sarah's wreck and her recovery

Interview notes from interview with Sarah Goffinet

File:Interview Notes with Sarah Goffinet.JPG

Interview Notes with Sarah Goffinet

Review of revision 2616020 [Not ready]

Revision 2616020 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Problematic; see below. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: If this had been submitted for review when it was evidently first written, the current lede would have been sufficient, though not ideal. Status was ambiguous; reporter was notified at the time, but didn't act on it at the time. Now it's three weeks old; that would be getting long in the tooth even for a full-blown interview, and since this isn't quite a full-blown interview, I'm inclined to think this is no longer fresh. The lede ought to make apparent the original reporting facet of this. The longer after the event, the more important for the lede to emphasis the original aspect. I'm not convinced it can be made strong enough to make up for the elapsed time. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2616020 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Problematic; see below. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: If this had been submitted for review when it was evidently first written, the current lede would have been sufficient, though not ideal. Status was ambiguous; reporter was notified at the time, but didn't act on it at the time. Now it's three weeks old; that would be getting long in the tooth even for a full-blown interview, and since this isn't quite a full-blown interview, I'm inclined to think this is no longer fresh. The lede ought to make apparent the original reporting facet of this. The longer after the event, the more important for the lede to emphasis the original aspect. I'm not convinced it can be made strong enough to make up for the elapsed time. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.