He was the spokesperson of the State Department. Anything he said is essentially the opinion of the department or could be interpreted as such.

Mikemoral♪♫22:09, 13 March 2011

That's ridiculous reasoning, and you know it.

98.250.168.229 (talk)22:49, 13 March 2011
 

More likely the State Department didn't want it looking like there was dissent in their ranks, because that would make people even less likely to take their official position seriously. Gotta toe the party line. [/sarcasm]

139.18.198.30 (talk)06:14, 14 March 2011