Wikinews

Government Should Be Viewpoint Neutral

Fragment of a discussion from Comments:Sydney plans loss of rainbow

Er. The government paid for this to promote tourism in the area. If the government is implicitly supporting any viewpoint, it is one that encourages locals to run events that bring in outside money to the region. You really need to take your militant heterosexual agenda at the expense of the local tax base and goodwill towards the local police force and re-evaluate it. You are implicitly non-neutral because you are taking an issue that has little to do with any sort of political agenda, taking an economic issue, and turning it into a militantly heterosexual position. Try again. And yeah, I guess this piece is implicitly promoting an anti-communist/anarchist viewpoint by implicitly supporting a pro-business position. Why do you hate functional capitalism?

LauraHale (talk)‎04:15, 6 April 2013
Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Thread:Comments:Sydney_plans_loss_of_rainbow/Government_Should_Be_Viewpoint_Neutral/reply_(5)#Government_Should_Be_Viewpoint_Neutral_8824"