Well, that's true, he's made some hilarious mistakes. I guess I mean that the mistakes to me are only hilarious. The little things he's said aren't relevant to BP, but people use him as a figurehead because it's easier. Yes, he's a scapegoat, but in an entirely logical business sense.

174.88.205.164 (talk)08:36, 26 July 2010

Well with a £10 million pension and a healthy "golden parachute" coming his way, I doubt anybody will feel too sorry for him. Still, it's not really his fault but he's convenient target for the media.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:40, 26 July 2010

Is someone 'taking responsibility' really what we need? Is that productive? How much will this change in leadership disrupt the organization of the company? How will this affect cleanup efforts? Is this act just a burnt effigy?

Personally I feel like this is just an attempt at spin, to change the focus of public scrutiny and opinion.

67.251.4.137 (talk)22:20, 26 July 2010

Yes, spin is exactly what it is. Of course that's what it is. It will have little to no actual impact on Tony Hayward, BP, or the environment. It will still be a largely successful attempt at spin.

174.88.205.164 (talk)01:22, 27 July 2010