Talk:William Salice, creator of Kinder Surprise eggs, dies at 83
Review of revision 4274920 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 4274920 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Please also note the advice about non-English sources, listed on WN:CS. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4274920 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Please also note the advice about non-English sources, listed on WN:CS. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- I'm not sure if we even have active reviewers who speak Spanish. Which is a shame, because it means this is unlikely to be reviewed, and I would like it to be. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 16:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- @AlvaroMolina: Since you speak Spanish, you can help in the translation of the Spanish sources in exact verbatim, and share it (of course of-wiki) to scoop@wikinewsie.org
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 16:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)- Actually, I'm starting to wonder if the English sources alone might be able to replace the Spanish originals entirely (prob best still to list them, though, since they were used to source the original this was translated from...). I might take a look and see if we can, in fact, review without the Spanish sources. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 16:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- Of all the articles I had written, it had never been questioned that it could not be revised for having Spanish sources, and that most of the articles that I have succeeded in creating here have been published to me without having sources in English. Similarly, all sources say relatively the same, except exceptions when mentioning countries that have restricted the sale of eggs, which is mentioned only in Spanish sources. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC) PD: Sorry if my English is not good.
- @AlvaroMolina: That prompted me to look closer, and I see @Pi zero: can, in fact, handle Spanish sources. :) So we should be able to relax. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 17:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Blood Red Sandman, User:AlvaroMolina: I can marginally handle Spanish sources; it's quite difficult for me. I try to be supportive, not to discourage contributors, and so have (when possible) put in much effort to try to cope; but it would be far easier to deal with English sources, and I always have to consider how much danger there is of missing some important nuance in a story because of my very poor grasp of the source language. --Pi zero (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- @AlvaroMolina: That prompted me to look closer, and I see @Pi zero: can, in fact, handle Spanish sources. :) So we should be able to relax. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 17:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- Of all the articles I had written, it had never been questioned that it could not be revised for having Spanish sources, and that most of the articles that I have succeeded in creating here have been published to me without having sources in English. Similarly, all sources say relatively the same, except exceptions when mentioning countries that have restricted the sale of eggs, which is mentioned only in Spanish sources. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC) PD: Sorry if my English is not good.
- Actually, I'm starting to wonder if the English sources alone might be able to replace the Spanish originals entirely (prob best still to list them, though, since they were used to source the original this was translated from...). I might take a look and see if we can, in fact, review without the Spanish sources. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 16:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
┌─────────────────────────────────┘
A source has been added, and all the facts can be verified from the listed English sources atm except for the composition.
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 17:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- In that case, I'll try a review in a few minutes. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 17:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Note before publishing
editDelete the redirects.
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 18:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Review of revision 4275412 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4275412 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Odd spelling on Color. Euronews uses the US spelling; Australian source doesn't. I asked Google and it seems US Eng is correct. I managed to get one small detail out of a Spanish source, with difficulty; otherwise, the English-lang stuff covered it all. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4275412 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Odd spelling on Color. Euronews uses the US spelling; Australian source doesn't. I asked Google and it seems US Eng is correct. I managed to get one small detail out of a Spanish source, with difficulty; otherwise, the English-lang stuff covered it all. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |