Talk:Wikinews interviews Great Britain men's national wheelchair basketball player Ade Oregembe

Journalist notes

Most of what there is can be found in the interview as this is a bit of a summary of that. The thing that can't is the start date for GB's Paralympic Campaign. That is here. Didn't include in the article as not so relevant though maybe. --LauraHale (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Please.......

....check your talk page. Bddpaux (talk) 02:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Done. Commented there. Changed the wording a bit. --LauraHale (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1564458 [Passed]

Revision 1564458 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Some of the same issues as with the Australians interview, but here a transcript would be more doable; not that it wouldn't be a bunch of work, but this is one-on-one between readily distinguished voices with a better-defined question-and-answer format. There are again some points of interest occurring only on the audio, and in this case the nuances of the racism question are lost in summary. A transcript of this would I suspect be fun to read. The material in the second paragraph is pretty scattered on the audio (e.g., I found the bit about Spain in the reply about racism). I did note the racism material starts at 6:15, Oscar Pistorious at 8:20, and 5-point players at 9:20. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1564458 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Some of the same issues as with the Australians interview, but here a transcript would be more doable; not that it wouldn't be a bunch of work, but this is one-on-one between readily distinguished voices with a better-defined question-and-answer format. There are again some points of interest occurring only on the audio, and in this case the nuances of the racism question are lost in summary. A transcript of this would I suspect be fun to read. The material in the second paragraph is pretty scattered on the audio (e.g., I found the bit about Spain in the reply about racism). I did note the racism material starts at 6:15, Oscar Pistorious at 8:20, and 5-point players at 9:20. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.