Talk:Wikinews at the Rugby: Sunshine Coast Stadium April 27, 2013

Notes etc

• I arrived at the ground at about 14:40 paid my five dollars to get in and sat in the main grand stand.
• Womans score: SC 26-15 TA as per File:Sunshine coast v Toowoomba Army womans 7's score.ogv
• A-Grade: Uni 21 Cal 31. Timing of Uni's opening score as per https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101840260/CAM_0542.JPG (clock was counting down)
  • University of the Sunshine Coast Barbarians hosted Caloundra Lighthouses
• Premier: SC 6 SB 36. Half time score SC 6 SB 17 as per File:Sunshine Coast RU7.ogv
  • Sunshine Coast Stingrays hosted Sunnybank Dragons
  • Last home game for a month as per [1]

--RockerballAustralia c 06:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Other scores as per https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=384895858292262&id=152478778200639 --RockerballAustralia c 05:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

post review

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101840260/CAM_0535.JPG and https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101840260/CAM_0535.JPG tell the time of the first try --RockerballAustralia c 21:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1887329 [Not ready]

Revision 1887329 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I cannot verify parts of this based on the talk page. Example: In other local A-Grade games, Maroochydore thrashed Nambour to the tune of seventy points, 75 points to five; and Caboolture easily accounted for Fraser Coast 46 points to 6. Noosa had the week off. Where is that sourced on the talk page? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1887329 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I cannot verify parts of this based on the talk page. Example: In other local A-Grade games, Maroochydore thrashed Nambour to the tune of seventy points, 75 points to five; and Caboolture easily accounted for Fraser Coast 46 points to 6. Noosa had the week off. Where is that sourced on the talk page? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1888600 [Passed]

Revision 1888600 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The media files should have captions. Regarding documentation. It seems clear I'm not seeing it all. You've got information in the article that isn't in the notes provide on the talk page. What's most worrisome isn't the specific information, but the suggestion that there's missing documentation about where the information comes from. Presumably you've some sort of notes that aren't visible here. What sort are they, and what can we do to better document them for an article? There was a discrepancy between the 32–21 score in the article and 31–21 in the notes. However, the FB page also in the notes listed 32–21, otherwise I'd have not-ready'd to clear that up. I also didn't see the 12 minutes anywhere, which seemed the most surprising of several miscellaneous embellishments that weren't documented on the talk page; minor embellishments often seem likely to be called to the reporter's mind by surrounding context... but 12 minutes? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1888600 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The media files should have captions. Regarding documentation. It seems clear I'm not seeing it all. You've got information in the article that isn't in the notes provide on the talk page. What's most worrisome isn't the specific information, but the suggestion that there's missing documentation about where the information comes from. Presumably you've some sort of notes that aren't visible here. What sort are they, and what can we do to better document them for an article? There was a discrepancy between the 32–21 score in the article and 31–21 in the notes. However, the FB page also in the notes listed 32–21, otherwise I'd have not-ready'd to clear that up. I also didn't see the 12 minutes anywhere, which seemed the most surprising of several miscellaneous embellishments that weren't documented on the talk page; minor embellishments often seem likely to be called to the reporter's mind by surrounding context... but 12 minutes? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.