Talk:Wikinews 2014: An 'Original reporting' year in review

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Pi zero in topic Review of revision 3118962 [Passed]

Accepted edit

Here are the reasons the articles used in this article were selected:

Rejected edit

The following were longlisted, but rejected for the reasons given

Heaven Sent Gaming interview edit

I'm left with one problematic item:

I'm very uncertain as to if we should use this or not. Thoughts appreciated. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 12:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

For the two-way conversation about that article (versus the mostly-one-way concerns in successive review comments), see User talk:Gownirony. --Pi zero (talk) 13:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Paralympics edit

I'd suggest rolling up the paralympics presence into a single piece, and doing a 'retrospective synthesis' from all the reports. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Having refactored the headings, and seeing sport at the back (just like a newspaper), what are thoughts on doing the same to other sport articles in this? i.e. have the Jan 3rd interview 'introduced as' prep for the paralympics reporting - carried out in January - as an opening on the sports section? --Brian McNeil / talk 14:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Flows nicer that way than I was expecting. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 16:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Presentation edit

I think the presentation on this is going to need a lot of work. For a start, the TOC needs shrunk and floated (right-side) so people are straight into the body of the article. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • I'd definitely retitle this, but not come up with a definitive alternative yet. In-itself, this is most-certainly navel-gazing; but, I think it is fully-justified. There are UK national newspapers publish less original reports in a year than already selected for this article.
As a suggestion for the title: "Wikinews' 2014, in original reporting". --Brian McNeil / talk 14:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I was hoping to figure out how to have ToC collapsed by default. With three of us now firmly backing this, I suppose this has left the realm of the 'possible'. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 16:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • TOC collapsed-by-default will require a little Javascript (I believe). Then it'd be a parameter on the template(s) to activate it.
Chucking it on one side was the best I could come up with, and makes it more in-keeping as almost-content. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

┌──────┘
Don't think we need, nor want, the collapsed ToC now. Could perhaps do with a couple more images, but I think this looks purty now. It will need copyediting somewhat more, plus captions double-checked (found one with "last 'day-of-week'"). --Brian McNeil / talk 17:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wikimention edit

I think we could do with either a smaller section-aimed wikimention template, or a one-off template for (footer?) of the article. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

size=small parameter sounds useful. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 17:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Review of revision 3118962 [Passed] edit

Return to "Wikinews 2014: An 'Original reporting' year in review" page.