Talk:Virginia reports suspected monkeypox case

Parking

Well, the South African case thing didn't pan out, as the sources seemed to've dried up/vanished. So much for that.--Bddpaux (talk) 19:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4683470 [Passed]

Revision 4683470 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Acknowledging your decade of experience precludes an unfair judgement this article required numerous, seemingly basic edits to make the lede flow, put all the important information rather than just picking whatever you fancied (and other symptoms? Just include them all?) &c. And smaller things, like wikitext, a photo more pertinent than the Rod of Ascelpius and even the source formatting. Please see my changes in history and understand I am reviewing this reluctantly, after several considerable edits, only because the framework and a good bit of the info was not too different. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4683470 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Acknowledging your decade of experience precludes an unfair judgement this article required numerous, seemingly basic edits to make the lede flow, put all the important information rather than just picking whatever you fancied (and other symptoms? Just include them all?) &c. And smaller things, like wikitext, a photo more pertinent than the Rod of Ascelpius and even the source formatting. Please see my changes in history and understand I am reviewing this reluctantly, after several considerable edits, only because the framework and a good bit of the info was not too different. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Admittedly, I'm a bit rusty and should've caught the wikitext lacking. I really like your graphic, for sure. A map never even crossed my mind. For some bizarre reason: it seemed (in that discrete moment) that the symptoms made it too wordy. Yeah...I know. Some might argue that your additions/deletions were a bridge too far for a reviewer, but: my thanks to you. I guess I need to practice up the chops a wee bit, don't I?--Bddpaux (talk) 21:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

You’re doing great, though we really do need more contributors. I’m worried I’m the only active reviewer right now — my Israel article went stale, for instance. Please forgive my dictatorship but I’d like to get things through. JJLiu112 (talk) 22:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)