Talk:US East Coast prepares for blizzard

"Although it is not officially winter yet"....

• Define starting of winter. Although the winter solctice has not yet occured, i think its safe to say its winter (traditioanlly, i think dec 25 = middle of winter, as opposed to start of winter). Bawolff ☺☻ 06:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Most articles/newscasts have said something similar about winter being two days away. I think it's arbitrary date that really has no meaning but alas most of the world probably disagrees with us. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I've changed it to "winter solstice" to make it more clear. Tempodivalse [talk] 15:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Photos

I'll have some photos once it becomes light enough to actually take a photo. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 10:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Hold on

Hold back on reviewing this for a bit, I have some info to add –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I was about to push the review button but saw your comment at the last second. :-) I'll see if I can round up some more East Coast contributors, perhaps we can do a collaborative OR with pictures, etc.? Tempodivalse [talk] 14:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

That's a good idea. The snow should be starting here any second, so I can do my share of reporting. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Would anyone object to replacing the unrelated snowfall image with a satellite/radar shot of this system? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. Tempodivalse [talk] 14:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Found something even more informative, I think. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

• Tell me when you've finished adding stuff so I can review, as I'd like to get this story out soon. Tempodivalse [talk] 15:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

• I'm satisfied with this now. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 924898 [Passed]

Revision 924898 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good. Do we have any East Coast contributors who could provide some OR/first-hand images for this? Maybe we could turn this into something of a collaborative photoessay piece? Tempodivalse [talk] 15:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 924898 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good. Do we have any East Coast contributors who could provide some OR/first-hand images for this? Maybe we could turn this into something of a collaborative photoessay piece? Tempodivalse [talk] 15:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.