Talk:USL v. BSDi settlement agreement unsealed
Fine to go- short, but is fine otherwise. Lyellin 04:50, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Accuracy:
- I checked the following facts.
- The 1994 settlement agreement between UNIX Systems Laboratories (USL) and BSDi (USL v. BSDi) was unsealed in November 2004 under the California Public Records Act (California Code § 6250-6270).
The details of the settlement may have ramifications with respect to the SCO v. IBM case with SCO believing it is the successor in interest to USL.
- sources:
- http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp?liArticleID=135515&liArticleTypeID=1&liCategoryID=2&liChannelID=28&liFlavourID=1&sSearch=&nPage=1
- http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=2728
- http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=10311&Page=1&pagePos=4
- http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/gov/6250-6270.html
- http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20041126130302760
- I think BSDi may be replaced as University of California, since that seems to be the party to the lawsuit/settlement. Other than that, no problem.
Neutrality:
- Seems okay to me.
Legality:
- Seems okay to me.
Scope/comprehensiveness:
- Though short, it is publishable, I think.
Style and writing:
- I think sources should be there.
I will make those changes, and I would find no problem publishing it.Tomos 21:16, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Additional comments:
After I made the changes, I came to think that we do not have to have sources that I added. After all, the article was written before those news reports. And it cited the primary source, Groklaw. I used secondary sources only to verify the articles' contents. So perhaps those sources can go out. Tomos 21:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about USL v. BSDi settlement agreement unsealed
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikinews the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve USL v. BSDi settlement agreement unsealed.
