Talk:UK inquiry into Iraq war will be held in private

The url for the second source is incorrect. Cheers. Bawolff ☺☻ 20:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision 834571 of this article has been reviewed by Bawolff (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: As a minor note, could of perhaps gone into a little more detail, particularly as to why protestors felt that the government is going to try to hide blame. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 834571 of this article has been reviewed by Bawolff (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: As a minor note, could of perhaps gone into a little more detail, particularly as to why protestors felt that the government is going to try to hide blame. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Is it too late?

Sorry, took out an apostrophe as article looked unreviewed, then saw the above template.

"and is being held in private for national security matters" Would "reasons / reasons of" be better? Esowteric | Talk 20:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry - you are free to make minnor grammatical changes up until the time its archived (in about two weeks). Since i just reviewed this now - feel free to make pretty much any changes you want. Its generally ok to make content changes for about a day or so after its published (any changes will be marked as waiting for approval before they go in the main version of the article). Bawolff ☺☻ 20:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a top-day article. You can add new content as well (it is actually encouraged). It will have to be sighted by someone else before it is viewable. --SVTCobra 22:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Protestors have reacted angrily to the news, believing the government will try to hide blame.

This sentence seems a bit weasely. Which protestors? What blame? --SVTCobra 22:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll try & sort that out today. Dottydotdot (talk) 07:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)