Talk:UK Parliament begins debate on Brexit deal

Writing log

This article will be context for further writing on proceedings in the next couple weeks. Need to flesh out, add references, verify sources, do a pretty pass, then submit to review. Need to do by 7th Dec. --James Pain (talk) 22:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Fleshed out a bit. Added some internal referenced. Crossed checked with sources and removed some content I couldn't verify. I think it's pretty enough to go. --James Pain (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Dear reviewer; It's been a long time since I edited in wikinews. Let me know how close or far away I am from the mark with this article. I'm on the UK time zone. Will respond in ~9 hours. Thanks! --James Pain (talk) 00:27, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Review of revision 4450103 [Passed]

Revision 4450103 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Neatly done. (As always, see detailed edits during review.) The category for brexit atm is the 2016 referendum category. Perhaps it's time to consider renaming it. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4450103 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Neatly done. (As always, see detailed edits during review.) The category for brexit atm is the 2016 referendum category. Perhaps it's time to consider renaming it. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

@Pi zero: perhaps supplementing it would be more apt? Making the present category a subcat. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 22:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

@Blood Red Sandman: Well... maybe. How useful it is to distinguish between the two categories kind of depends on what's going to happen in future. --Pi zero (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)