Talk:U.S. tennis player Coco Gauff wins U.S. Open women's singles tournament

Review of revision 4744030 [Not ready]

Revision 4744030 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: It has been confirmed Gauff will play Muchová tonight. Updating to reflect that can be as simple as rewriting the sentence mentioning that game (and a source, obviously). Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: The lede should state the when of the focal event, in this case Gauff defeating Ostapenko. Speaking of which, the sentence describing the Gauff-Ostapenko game should be shifted into the lede, as it is indeed the focal event (Gauff advancing to the Semifinals is merely a result of it). Comments by reviewer: HushPuppie280: If you're quick, it's possible I can review this before it becomes out-of-date when Gauff and Muchová play tonight. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4744030 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: It has been confirmed Gauff will play Muchová tonight. Updating to reflect that can be as simple as rewriting the sentence mentioning that game (and a source, obviously). Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: The lede should state the when of the focal event, in this case Gauff defeating Ostapenko. Speaking of which, the sentence describing the Gauff-Ostapenko game should be shifted into the lede, as it is indeed the focal event (Gauff advancing to the Semifinals is merely a result of it). Comments by reviewer: HushPuppie280: If you're quick, it's possible I can review this before it becomes out-of-date when Gauff and Muchová play tonight. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Re-Submit

I tried to update it to the best of my abilities. Thank you. HushPuppie280 (talk) 18:56, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for updating it, but...the style problems haven't been fixed. Heavy Water (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

I don't know how to do that, sorry. HushPuppie280 (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

I updated the story. HushPuppie280 (talk) 02:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Title change to advances to U.S. Open final, or championship match. Thank you. 64.39.81.54 (talk) 01:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Publication???

It looks good enough? Thoughts? 64.39.81.54 (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Thoughts on publication? 64.39.81.54 (talk) 03:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

I've refocused the article and I should hope it's to Wikinews standards now. Please see also the remarks I left at User talk:Chaetodipus#Gauff. It still must undergo the formal review process by an independent reviewer (though, this being a volunteer-run project, we're perennially short on hands). —chaetodipus (talk · contribs) 03:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Any updates? Thank you. 64.39.81.54 (talk) 14:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Review of revision 4744486 [Passed]

Revision 4744486 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Congratulations on the first article you worked on to get published, HushPuppie280, and thanks for working on it, Chaetodipus. Well-written, but these things came up: Bizarrely, the article cited a September 7 AP article (syndicated by MSN), but provided the NBC source's URL as its. I removed the citation as a duplicate. With "Gauff is the first U.S. teenager to play in the U.S. Open finals since...", presumably you didn't mean finals, as it seems to me that would include quarterfinals, and I can't find any indication in sources Gauff's the first US teenager to reach the women's quarterfinals since 2001 (plus I'm unsure if sources are implying "women's" when saying "the semifinals") so I backed off to saying she was the most recent to play in the women's final. This may have been improved with quotes from Gauff and Sabalenka. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4744486 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Congratulations on the first article you worked on to get published, HushPuppie280, and thanks for working on it, Chaetodipus. Well-written, but these things came up: Bizarrely, the article cited a September 7 AP article (syndicated by MSN), but provided the NBC source's URL as its. I removed the citation as a duplicate. With "Gauff is the first U.S. teenager to play in the U.S. Open finals since...", presumably you didn't mean finals, as it seems to me that would include quarterfinals, and I can't find any indication in sources Gauff's the first US teenager to reach the women's quarterfinals since 2001 (plus I'm unsure if sources are implying "women's" when saying "the semifinals") so I backed off to saying she was the most recent to play in the women's final. This may have been improved with quotes from Gauff and Sabalenka. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.