Talk:U.S. President creates Chimney Rock National Monument
Review of revision 1632273 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 1632273 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:42, 21 September 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1632273 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:42, 21 September 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
The section with use of this 'cute' Latin shorthand caught my eye.
I've checked the sources, and didn't find anyone saying outright that additional costs would be negligible. And, if this is being linked to the election, the action is not being linked to the election by the White House, nor is such being clearly attributed to any political player within the cited sources. Bill Hudson's editorial implies such, but it would need to be more-unambiguously sourced.
And, 'de mnimus' is, as I say, "cute Latin shorthand". If there is no more-natural way to phrase this in English, that link should go to Wiktionary. --Brian McNeil / talk 08:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- I hope "negligible" doesn't have too many letters. Yours aye, Buaidh 00:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Review time
editPerhaps I am naive, but it seems as if we should be able to review an article in less than six hours. Your comments? Yours aye, Buaidh 18:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1634389 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1634389 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Couldn't find any 'direct' reference in sources (and I searched outwith those cited) for republicans directly criticising this proclamation as election-year pandering - though I don't doubt it's been muttered about. I've reworded to mention their longer-term, and definitely sourced, 'uh',... "drill baby, drill" 'attitude' :P The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1634389 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Couldn't find any 'direct' reference in sources (and I searched outwith those cited) for republicans directly criticising this proclamation as election-year pandering - though I don't doubt it's been muttered about. I've reworded to mention their longer-term, and definitely sourced, 'uh',... "drill baby, drill" 'attitude' :P The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |