Talk:U.S. President Trump defends decision to share classified information with Russians
Review of revision 4314586 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 4314586 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4314586 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Finding a corroborating source was the easy part. I've also done some reorganization. For the record, I did go digging for quotes from any Republicans or other politicians in support of the President, but the closest I could find amounted to "it's not illegal,"[1] which didn't seem worth the additional space. I welcome other views. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Breaking developments
edit@Pi zero: NYTimes, Wall Street J and MSN all just identified Israel as the source of the intelligence. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Darkfrog24: Taken out from under review. I don't think I have a full review in me tonight anyway; I was up until about 3am doing a review... how many nights ago? and I'm barely recovered. I lost my facility with all-nighters shortly after the 2012 electin. --Pi zero (talk) 03:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Catch some Z's while I update the A on PrezT. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, the MSN link seems to be a reprint of the NYTimes article (though I haven't checked every line). Is there any way to cite the NYTimes as the primary and add MSN as a courtesy link for non-subscribers who don't want to use up their ten NYFreebies? Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would suggest just improvising a way. --Pi zero (talk) 04:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, I did the line-by-line and they're not exactly the same, just very similar. One could be a paraphrase of the other. Gonna go with the non-paywalled one. Darkfrog24 (talk) 11:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would suggest just improvising a way. --Pi zero (talk) 04:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, the MSN link seems to be a reprint of the NYTimes article (though I haven't checked every line). Is there any way to cite the NYTimes as the primary and add MSN as a courtesy link for non-subscribers who don't want to use up their ten NYFreebies? Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Catch some Z's while I update the A on PrezT. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Review of revision 4314835 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4314835 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4314835 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |