Talk:U.S. Army revives next-generation Ground Combat Vehicle program

Copyright waiver

The text on this page from wikipedia was released into the public domain by me. See my Wikipedia userpage. And yes, it was all written by me. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 22:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Stale?

If this article is unlikely to be published due to its staleness then please do not delete it. Please archive it instead if possible. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 02:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately that's not how it works. We only archive that which we publish, after it is published. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 02:33, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

• Though your story can't appear in our archive, you can, however, typically move an unpublished article to your userspace (or we can move it on request) where it is usually safe from the memory hole deletion, unless it is spammy. You could keep it there until you get an update on the story (a development or an interview perhaps) that helps you to make a case for it being newsworthy again.
• There have been several decent articles go stale this week as reviewers have been relatively inactive (and there has been more material to review - which is great if we could only plan for it!)

--InfantGorilla (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1138208 [Passed]

Revision 1138208 of this article has been reviewed by Cartman02au (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Even though the article is two days old, it is still significant and worthy of publication. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1138208 of this article has been reviewed by Cartman02au (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Even though the article is two days old, it is still significant and worthy of publication. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.