Talk:U.S. Army identifies remains of last U.S. soldier unaccounted for in Iraq

Review of revision 1418046 [Not ready]

Revision 1418046 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This needs a lede that —only— succinctly answers as many as reasonably possible of the basic questions about the focal news event of the article. Here the headline clearly identifies the focus; but the first paragraph is both missing some information that belongs in the lede, and includes some information that does not belong in the lede. The information currently in the last sentence belongs in the lede (falls under what), while the first paragraph contains far too much detail; details belong in subsequent paragraphs, per inverted pyramid style. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1418046 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This needs a lede that —only— succinctly answers as many as reasonably possible of the basic questions about the focal news event of the article. Here the headline clearly identifies the focus; but the first paragraph is both missing some information that belongs in the lede, and includes some information that does not belong in the lede. The information currently in the last sentence belongs in the lede (falls under what), while the first paragraph contains far too much detail; details belong in subsequent paragraphs, per inverted pyramid style. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1419606 [Passed]

Revision 1419606 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I notice you keep having problems with copyvios. I had to change some bits of this that were too close to the sources. Please do make an effort with this as you do not want sued. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1419606 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I notice you keep having problems with copyvios. I had to change some bits of this that were too close to the sources. Please do make an effort with this as you do not want sued. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.