Talk:Tokyo Electric Power Company releases first figures on the extent of Fukushima leakage

Review of revision 1967561 [Not ready]

Revision 1967561 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The infobox, thumbnailing of the image, adding all relevant categories and adding of interwiki links should really have been done by reporter. That said, outstanding issues include: When was the first public statement made? This is not answered in the first paragraph. The airquotes style thing around the “high possibility” should be closer to who this is attributed to. The when issue is not answered basically until the end, but even then there is no information on WHEN that earthquake took place. Opinions and intangibles need to be attributed. Example text where things need to be attributed: The impact of the radioactive leakage in Japan, how it will affect nearby countries, is currently unknown. However, the tremor served as a reminder of the 9.0 magnitude earthquake that struck Fukushima in 2011, destroying much of the nuclear power plant, claiming the lives of over 15 000 people, and causing over 3 200 people to go missing. Please add interwiki links based on proper nouns where categories on Wikinews or articles on wikipedia exist. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1967561 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The infobox, thumbnailing of the image, adding all relevant categories and adding of interwiki links should really have been done by reporter. That said, outstanding issues include: When was the first public statement made? This is not answered in the first paragraph. The airquotes style thing around the “high possibility” should be closer to who this is attributed to. The when issue is not answered basically until the end, but even then there is no information on WHEN that earthquake took place. Opinions and intangibles need to be attributed. Example text where things need to be attributed: The impact of the radioactive leakage in Japan, how it will affect nearby countries, is currently unknown. However, the tremor served as a reminder of the 9.0 magnitude earthquake that struck Fukushima in 2011, destroying much of the nuclear power plant, claiming the lives of over 15 000 people, and causing over 3 200 people to go missing. Please add interwiki links based on proper nouns where categories on Wikinews or articles on wikipedia exist. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1967577 [Not ready]

Revision 1967577 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Wikilinks in the article (i.e., links to Wikinews or any of its sister projects such as Wikipedia) should use {{w}}, for example like this: {{w|Australia|Australian}} which produces Australian. External links are not allows in the body of the article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1967577 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Wikilinks in the article (i.e., links to Wikinews or any of its sister projects such as Wikipedia) should use {{w}}, for example like this: {{w|Australia|Australian}} which produces Australian. External links are not allows in the body of the article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1967637 [Not ready]

Revision 1967637 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Headline does not explain who TEPCO is. Headline focus is on the release of figures, lede focuses on a statement. Which should it be? I didn't bother going past these two items. They need fixing before I can reasonably understand what is happening. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1967637 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Headline does not explain who TEPCO is. Headline focus is on the release of figures, lede focuses on a statement. Which should it be? I didn't bother going past these two items. They need fixing before I can reasonably understand what is happening. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Help with renaming an article

Would anyone be able to tell me how to rename the title of my article, as requested by a reviewer? When I go to 'edit' the story, I seem to only be able to change the body of the text, not the headline. I apologise if this seems like a silly question. It is my first attempt at writing a Wikinews article and I am still trying to familiarise myself with the process. Many thanks in advance Isabelle Chesher Isabelle Chesher (talk) 02:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1968186 [Passed]

Revision 1968186 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Remove some redundancies and some not quite verifiable stuck. The Reporter seemed to listen to what xe was being told in review :). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1968186 of this article has been reviewed by RockerballAustralia (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Remove some redundancies and some not quite verifiable stuck. The Reporter seemed to listen to what xe was being told in review :). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.