Talk:Tennis: Nadal beats Thiem to win eleventh French Open title

Reporter's notes

Reviewers may require JS enabled and cookies accepted for RG's website. The broadcast report photos are: 1 and 2
•–• 18:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

The article is stale, has been killed by MSM, and it is pointless to review it now.
•–• 03:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

@Acagastya: What do you mean by "killed by MSM"? --Pi zero (talk) 03:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

"MSM killing the story" -- heavily covered by MSM.
•–• 03:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Perception on which may depend on which part of msm one follows most closely. --Pi zero (talk) 03:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Review of revision 4412930 [Passed]

Revision 4412930 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Broadcast report, arguably a mild form of original reporting, surely doesn't hurt the freshness status. At any rate, I do feel rather different about the prospect of publishing it now than I would if I left it till tomorrow morning my time (about six or eight hours from now). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4412930 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Broadcast report, arguably a mild form of original reporting, surely doesn't hurt the freshness status. At any rate, I do feel rather different about the prospect of publishing it now than I would if I left it till tomorrow morning my time (about six or eight hours from now). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

When last year's article says "Only Roger Federer has more than him." BBC says, "The victory means the past six Grand Slam titles have been won by either Nadal or Federer" as well as "Nadal, 32, won 6-4 6-3 6-2 to earn his 17th Grand Slam, three adrift of Roger Federer's all-time men's record." What was the fact that you could not verify?
•–• 05:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Last year when Nadal won the French Open, he had fifteen. After that:

1. Wimbledon 2017: Federer -- 19th
2. US Open 2017: Nadal -- 16th
3. [ Aus Open 2018]: Federer -- 20th
4. French Open 2018: Nadal -- 17th

•–• 05:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

The sources say Federer has the most. The sources say Nadal has three fewer than Federer. The sources do not, afaics, say that nobody other than Nadal is as close to Federer's record. --Pi zero (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)